This is one of those plays I had never heard of but decided
to go see just because it was an Empty Space production and I had an evening
free with my date. It also sounded like an intriguing concept.
The basic idea is that there are two actors, portraying
Jamie and Cathy, a couple who meet, fall in love, get married, grow apart, and
split up, all within five years. Their stories are told in reverse order, so
Jamie starts his with them falling in love, while Cathy starts hers with the
aftermath of the breakup. As the play progresses, they meet briefly in the
middle, during the wedding. Then, we see his progression toward the breakup,
while her story goes back in time to the beginning.
Furthermore, there is essentially no dialogue, and nearly
everything is told through song, not spoken lines. It is an interesting way of
putting a play together - but also a challenging one to pull off. The hardest
part, in my opinion, is creating chemistry when the two actors are rarely on
stage together, and when they are, the either interact solely through acting,
not dialogue, and are often even at different places in the story. The second
hardest part is pulling off the challenging music. More about that later.
Jason Robert Brown wrote this play - and the music and score
and everything - it is essentially a one-man show. That is pretty impressive
from the level of difficulty. Wagner, of course, did the same thing, although
his were decidedly longer and more turgid, although they contained some of the
most transcendent music of all time. There are pitfalls to this approach,
however. One of which is that generally either
the music or the poetry is good, but rarely if ever both. In this case, I think
both had some issues. The music was sometimes a bit too obscure to serve the
plot, and the stream-of-consciousness lyrics were sometimes a bit hard to
follow.
The play was apparently inspired (if that is the right word)
by Brown’s own failed marriage. When the play first came out, she threatened to
sue him. He changed one song so it wasn’t quite as obviously autobiographical.
The irony of this is that Brown actually wrote the play so that “his”
character, Jamie, is pretty unsympathetic. Bluntly, he is an asshole most of the
play, obsessed with his career, callous about Cathy’s own failures, and fully
expectant that she will be the little trophy wife and go to all his publicity
stuff with him. And then, he cheats on her, and then complains that “I could
never rescue you.” Ouch. I have to wonder if Brown’s ex-wife actually listened
to the play, because she comes off as the better person.
The Empty Space took an interesting approach to the casting.
They cast two actors in each role, and then used each combination - a total of
four - for different nights. In addition, while two women (Megan Jarrett and
Ellie Sivesind) played the part of Cathy, the role of Jamie was split between
male and female (namely, Alex Mitts, and Baeleigh Bevan.) This meant that there
were two opposite sex couples, and two same sex couples. I was only able to see
one particular combination - Jarrett and Bevan - so I cannot say how the other
combinations worked. Although it is safe to assume that each combination had a
different feel to it.
Ellie Sivesind and Alex Mitts
Megan Jarrett and Baeleigh Bevan
One of the advantages of seeing this performed by a same sex
couple is this: all the stupid male privilege and entitlement looks a bit
different when it is a woman doing it. So, as a great example, one of the
better songs, “A
Miracle Would Happen,” is Jamie’s experience being the popular guy that all
the girls hit on. Seriously. Read the lyrics. Jamie is a total asshole, and it
sounds even more horrifying when it is a woman singing the lyrics. (Blame my
gender essentialist upbringing for my response to that.) Once you strip away
the “boys will be boys” and the wink and nudge about supposed male sexuality,
and see a woman treat another one that way, it is pretty clear that it is just
atrocious behavior.
I should mention the other really clever song, “Audition
Sequence,” which is brutally honest about the pressure that theater puts on
women.
As a musician, I did find the score to be fascinating. The
style is pretty broad, from pop and rock to jazz, classical, and klezmer. And
within that, the keys are ambiguous and rapidly modulating, the time signatures
and tempos variable. As a result, the vocal demands are really high, and the
songs difficult to pull off. The instrumentation is sparse and eclectic: piano,
acoustic guitar, bass, violin, and two cellos. At first, I thought is was a
string quartet - because the one cello essentially takes the role of both viola
and second violin. Which means you had better have a badass cellist. TES has no
space for live musicians, so it was a recording. I would have love to play this
score, though, challenging as it would be. It is quite impressive how Brown
covers the various musical genres without a drummer. In my opinion, the score
is the strongest part of the musical for that reason.
The downside of this, though, is that the vocal demands are
really high. I’m hardly a great singer, and couldn’t even fumble my way through
this. But as a violinist, I know enough to see the difficulty level. The venue
didn’t help, either, as TES doesn’t use microphones, and the audience is a full
270 degrees, so it is imperative that vocalists make sure every nuance comes
through.
So, even though I hate to say something negative about a
local production, the vocals were a weak point. Specifically, there were times
when Bevan simply could not be heard. We were seated at stage right, and when
she turned to the left, we just lost the voice completely. This was
particularly an issue when the song took her down into the low range, or when
there were a lot of those stream-of-consciousness lyrics where every word is
crucial. So, for her opening song, “Shiksa Goddess,” I didn’t figure out the
key point that Cathy isn’t Jewish - which is why Jamie’s mother is going to
freak out in a way that she wouldn’t even if Cathy came from an incestuous
family. I just lost too many of the lyrics to get the picture.
To be fair to Bevan, she was covering a “male” part, so the
low range may have been a struggle for her anyway. And then add the difficult
pacing and often unusual syntax, and I sympathise. I got the impression that
she actually sings quite well, but that this had just too many difficulties for
her to overcome. That said, I will forgive a lot, but I have to be able to hear
the lyrics. On the plus side, I thought Bevan did a fine job of making Jamie a
more nuanced character, not just the jerk his part suggests.
Jarrett was better. I think the range was more comfortable
for her, and she just belted it out. I will give particular credit to her for
some extended notes that she held without going the least bit flat. Because I
have played enough music theater to have winced at plenty of otherwise
outstanding performances which suffered from at least one note that deflated by
the end.
Singing aside, I thought both actors did pretty well
considering they rarely got to interact. The format is interesting, to be sure,
but does make it difficult to really see if there is chemistry between the
actors. As with the songs, I would have liked to have seen if any of the other
combinations made a strong connection despite the challenges.
With the flaws aside, I do want to give TES credit for
trying unusual works, and not just recycling the same 20 favorite musicals and
plays. Not everything always comes together perfectly, but credit for taking
some risks.
One final note: as usual, TES has such creative sets in a
small space. The whole exploding clock thing was excellent. Credit to Brian
Sivesind and Jesus Fidel for their design - and to the small army of volunteers
who bring every set to life.
No comments:
Post a Comment