Source of book: I own this.
Although
I probably would have developed a love for snark one way or another, I
blame the fact that I read a good bit of Mark Twain and James Thurber
during my high school years. (Twain’s The Innocents Abroad did much to make me cynical of guided tours and saintly relics. And the line, “Is...is he dead?”
still makes me laugh.) Thurber’s style still fascinates me as well. His
wordplay and puns, the fraught male-female relations, his intolerance
for annoying dinner guests, and his delightfully primitive drawings -
all these characteristics make for delightful reading, particularly when
combined with his dry, understated wit.
Those who have not read any Thurber might start with his best known work, “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty,” or perhaps Fables for Our Times. (Moral: Don’t count your boobies before they are hatched.)
Thurber
was born in Ohio in 1894. His father was probably his model for the
timid protagonist with the far stronger wife. His mother was quite the
live wire. Thurber called her a natural comedian, and her strongest form
of humor was the practical joke. (More about her later.) As a child, he
lost an eye after his brother accidentally shot him with an arrow. His
eyesight in the remaining eye was injured as well, and he eventually
became practically blind.
I
noted in one of my posts on P. G. Wodehouse that it was interesting
that it was Wodehouse and Thurber who wrote the character of the
hen-pecked man more convincingly than any other authors - despite the
fact that they were both happily married. Thurber did experience an
unhappy first marriage, but he hardly seemed to have been a pushover.
His second wife Helen was much better suited to life with an author, and
indeed she helped him greatly as his sight failed. Friends described
them as a devoted couple.
Thurber wrote primarily for The New Yorker,
during its heyday under founder Harold Ross. (Thurber would write about
his relationship with Ross, who was quite a character, in The Years with Ross.)
His various fiction and non-fiction works were then collected and
published as books. He also wrote a few stand-alone works, such as his
surreal fairy tale, The Thirteen Clocks.
Of the Thurber collections I had previously read, I would have voted for Lanterns and Lances
as my favorite, based on the pleasing variety of topics, the
nightmarish tales of his insomnia, when words would haunt his thoughts,
and on the delightful tales of how annoying other people’s children -
and their doting parents - are, “The Darlings at the Top of the Stairs”
and “Moments with Mandy.” Oh, and also essays on ill-used language, such
as the prescient “The Spreading ‘You Know’” and “Friends, Romans,
Countrymen, Lend me Your Earmuffs.” However, I think that Alarms and Diversions might now be my favorite. By a little. At least because it has more drawings.
While
language does not take up as much space in this particular collection,
Thurber’s wit still shines in essays such as “The Psychosemanticist Will
See You Now, Mr. Thurber,” which includes delightfully descriptive
terms such as “carcinomenclature” (meaninglessly obtuse descriptions),
and memorable phrases like, “the psychic trauma caused by linguistic
meaninglessness.” In our increasingly jargonistic times, Thurber’s
perspective could have been written in our own time, rather than the
1940s and 50s.
Also
surprising is how well Thurber understood trends that we think of as
modern. For example, he wrote wonderful sendups of parenting trends
(“...the tendency of our time to oversimplify problems, especially where
little girls are concerned...” is a great line in an essay on poor
parenting techniques), belief in mythical creatures (an essay on the
Loch Ness Monster compares it memorably to the Beast of Revelation), the
Christmas card culture, and panic about the supposed “feminization” of
everything - particularly literature.
Another
incident in Thurber’s life gave rise to another modern conundrum.
Thurber spent several months during World War One as a code clerk for
the State Department. For whatever reason, he was never given much of a
screening, being asked only if his grandparents were born in the United
States.
Waking
up at night now and looking back on it, I sometimes wonder how I would
have come out of one of those three-men inquisitions the State
Department was once caught conducting. Having as great a guilt sense as
any congressman, and a greater tendency to confession, it might have
taken me hours to dredge up out of my mind and memory all the
self-indictments that must have been there. I believed then, and still
do, that generals of the Southern Confederacy were, in the main,
superior to generals of the Northern armies; I suspected there were
flaws in the American political system; I doubted the virgin birth of
United States senators; I thought that German cameras and English
bicycles were better than ours; and I denied the existence of actual
proof that God was exclusively a citizen of the United States.
It
wouldn’t be a Thurber book without some funny stuff about the “battle
of the sexes,” of course. I liked the banter between Thurber and his
wife after he made a questionable impulse purchase.
My
wife sighed. “Men shouldn’t be allowed to shop alone,” she said. “It’s -
it’s dangerous.” No, it isn’t,” I protested. “Well, chaotic, then,” she
said. I settled for that.
His
self-deprecating humor at the expense of males is balanced by his
hilarious portrait of his aunt Wilma, who couldn’t do math to save her
life, yet insisted on arguing with the local merchant about the amount
of change.
One
of the best essays in the collection is entitled “My Own Ten Rules for a
Happy Marriage.” Inspired (he says) by the couple in a nearby apartment
who destroyed the tasteful arrangement of their home by appropriating
the knick-knacks as projectiles, he decided to make his own list.
I
have avoided the timeworn admonitions, such as “Praise her new hat,”
“Share his hobbies,” “Be as sweetheart as well as a wife,” and “Don’t
keep a blond in the guest room,” not only because they are threadbare
from repetition, but also because they don’t seem to have accomplished
their purpose.
Thurbers rules are at turns silly, satiric, and pointed. Examples, in that order:
Rule
Two: A man should make an honest effort to get the names of his wife’s
friends right. This is not easy. The average wife who was graduated from
college during the past thirty years keeps in close touch with at least
seven old classmates. These ladies, know as “the girls,” are named,
respectively: Mary, Marian, Melissa, Majorie, Maribel, Madeleine, and
Miriam; and all of they are called Myrtle by the careless husband we are
talking about. Furthermore, he gets their nicknames wrong. This, to be
sure, is understandable, since their nicknames are, respectively: Molly,
Muffy, Missy, Midge, Mabby, Maddy, and Mims...”
Rule Three: A husband should not insult his wife publicly, at parties. He should insult her in the privacy of the home...
Rule
Four: The wife who keeps saying, “Isn’t that just like a man?” and the
husband who keeps saying, “Oh well, you know how women are,” are likely
to grow farther and farther apart through the years. These famous
generalizations have the effect of reducing an individual to the
anonymous status of a mere unit in a mass...
This
last one, in particular, is one that I have observed to cause immense
damage in relationships - and kudos to Thurber for finding a way to make
it amusing by the end.
Another
fun one was his idea that a wife might need to draw a detailed map of
the house, showing the location of all objects the husband might need.
(My wife probably has thought this at some point.) Of course, the
problem is that he would lose the map.
And,
in the way that only Thurber can find a way to mix relationships with
grammar, there is this great paragraph near the end of the “rules.”
Two
persons living in holy matrimony, I should have said long before this,
must avoid slipping into blasphemy, despond, apathy, and the subjunctive
mood. A husband is always set on edge by his mate’s “Far be it from me”
or “Be that as it may.” This can lead to other ominous openings: “Would
God that” and “Had I only the good sense to,” and the couple is then in
the gloomy sub-cellar of the pluperfect subjunctive, a place where no
marriage can thrive. The safest place for a happily wedded pair is the
indicative mood, and of its tenses the present is the most secure. The
future is a domain of threats and worries, and the past is a wasteland
of sorrows and regrets.
I
want to mention two more essays that I loved. Both are biographies. The
first is a portrait of a woman known to everyone as “Aunt Margery,”
from “Daguerreotype of a Lady.” Aunt Margery is a midwife and herbalist,
with a delightfully quirky personality. She was obviously a big
influence on the very young Thurber.
The
second is entitled “Lavender with a Difference,” and is Thurber’s
touching (and hilarious) obituary for his mother. As I noted above, she
was quite a practical joker. In fact, by the end of the first couple of
pages, I realized that I had found a female version of my father-in-law,
who pulled some pretty outrageous and delightful pranks in his younger
years. (He drywalled over the door to a dorm-mate’s room while he was
home for the holidays, for example.)
Mrs.
Thurber borrowed all the dogs in the neighborhood to pull a prank on
her uptight aunt, pretended (in a brilliant disguise - including young
James as a prop) to attempt to purchase the house next door, harassed
the local merchants with requests for a single shoe or glove, and so on.
The best, however, was when she snuck into a meeting hosted by a “faith
healer,” borrowed a wheelchair sitting outside, and pretended to regain
her ability to walk. Unfortunately, the owner of the chair was not
amused...
Finally,
I do want to share some of the illustrations. Thurber’s art was, shall
we say, a bit simplistic. Like Mo Willems of the “Pigeon” series of
children’s books (I love his stuff!), his art has an unexpected impact.
He is able to convey mood and emotion in a minimum of detail.
Here are a few of my favorites from Alarms and Diversions.
I apologize for the poor quality. I had to take pictures from a book that didn't want to stay open. These are really hard to find online -
particularly the ones that fit my quirky sense of humor.
The typical Thurber male.
I suspect that this is the fear that keeps my wife from being a camper. And she has a point...
Poetry geeks will appreciate this one.
Clearly Mr. Thurber shared with me a knowledge of Homer and an annoyance at "morning people."
Danny Kaye first introduced me to Thurber, through The Secret Life of Walter Mitty. (I'm the only one in my family who likes that movie. Everyone else thinks its weird.) Watching the movie as a teen caused me to pursue reading the book which led me to only one other Thurber book thus far. More to do. :)
ReplyDeleteI must admit I never saw the movie - although I do like Danny Kaye. I am curious how they stretched a short story to a feature length film, but I do like the story.
DeleteOk, I laughed at the Trochee v. Spondee, but I don't typically care for his artwork. I do like James Thurber quite a bit.
ReplyDelete.
ReplyDeleteI hate to be THAT GUY, but I'm pretty sure that's an iamb.
I wondered if the publisher flipped the picture, or if Thurber was trolling English majors. :)
DeleteThurber's inability to identify or to draw mythological prosodic creatures was a failing that brought him not only shame but also quite a decent income.
ReplyDelete