Source of book: Borrowed from the Library, but I would love to own it.
Alex Ross’ first book, The Rest is Noise,
 is, hands down, the best book I have ever read on Twentieth Century 
classical music. Even though I have played semi-professionally for 
sixteen years, I never really grasped the connections in thought and 
technique that united and divided the composers of the last century. 
This book was revolutionary to my thought, and sparked an interest in 
these “modern” works. Since I was not reviewing books at the time I read
 it, this will have to suffice for a recommendation. 
This
 second book by Ross is not exactly a book about a topic, but a 
collection of essays that occasionally intersect. With the exception of 
the first chapter, all of the essays were originally published in The New Yorker,
 although the author did revise several of them for the book. This is 
not a bad thing, as Ross is interesting to read about anything music 
related. 
Ross
 makes an interesting confession at the beginning of the book. He was 
not exposed to popular music until age twenty. Up to that time, he had 
been steeped in classical and nothing else. (I can identify to a degree:
 I was a mostly
 classical listener during my minority, and listened to nearly nothing 
from my own generation.) Several of the essays give some of the author’s
 story as he discovers the world of music he had not known. Thus, there 
are interesting articles on Bjork, Radiohead, and a few others. No one 
else could have made an entirely apt parallel between Kurt Cobain and 
John Donne on the subject of suicide, but Ross makes the connection in a
 startling yet fitting way. 
Classical
 music is still Ross’ first love (and mine too), and he distills the 
paradox of the music into an insightful thought. “The music attracts the
 reticent fraction of the population. It is an art of grand gestures and
 vast dimensions that plays to mobs of the quiet and shy.” In so many 
ways, music was an outlet for me as an introverted boy. I found my 
emotional connection in my music: I could communicate with others in a 
way that I never could through words. 
The
 chapter on recorded music was also thought provoking. John Philip Sousa
 called them “infernal machines,” and they certainly did change the 
nature of music listening and performance. While many lament that the 
participation in the music making process is no longer an integral part 
of our culture, Ross also notes that recorded music allowed African 
American artists to break into the mainstream in a way that they never 
could have done without recording devices. 
I
 would also note that the chapters on Verdi and Brahms were excellent 
and enlightening in many ways, whether for the seasoned musician or for 
the casual fan. 
I
 also enjoyed the chapter on the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s former music
 director, Esa-Pekka Salonen. These days, Gustavo Dudamel is all the 
rage. He is young, charismatic, and talented. Salonen never really 
received the publicity. Ross is able to draw out his personality and 
make him seem more human and revolutionary in his own way. As an 
introvert myself, I loved the adage that Salonen, a Finn, was apt to 
quote: “A Finnish introvert looks at his own shoes, while a Finnish 
extrovert looks at other people’s shoes.” 
Another
 observation that struck me is found in the epic chapter on the Chacona 
(which I will discuss further). The battle between the old and the new 
in sacred music is timeless. Some would have you believe that all was 
well until Rock and Roll burst onto the scene, and that prior to that 
was an era of harmony and concord when all agreed on good taste and 
“godly” music. Not so. From the dawn of recorded musical history, there 
have always been two fights. On the one hand, each generation has 
disdained the new forms and asserted that the old forms were best. On 
the other, there has been a tension between a concept of “exalted” music
 and “vulgar” music. Whether it was the question of Latin versus the 
vernacular, or polyphony attainable only by professionals versus 
popular, singable melodies; the issues have divided the church for 
centuries. Nay, for millenia! Again, Ross captures the issue in a pithy 
quote about the use of the Chaconne (a popular music form). “Dance fads 
such as the chaconne indicated the growing vitality of the vernacular. 
The Church, shaken by the challenge of the Reformation and its catchy 
hymns of praise, saw the need to make its messages more transparent...” 
As
 a musician myself, I must also praise Ross for his chapter on the 
Marlboro chamber music festival. I have played in string quartets for 
more than half my life, and it is my dream (like most string players) to
 spend a retirement making music with a few friends. The legendary 
Emanuel Ax describes chamber music as a state where “no one leads and no
 one follows.” This is completely true about an ensemble that has 
attained that magical state where all hearts beat as one. Where the 
music takes on a life of its own. When this occurs, joy, sorrow, 
passion, and music become tangled up, and one emerges as from a trance, 
certain that one will never be the same. I feel that this is also a good
 representation of a truly successful marriage. No one leads, and no one
 follows, because the music becomes all. As in a quartet, once the focus
 becomes leading and following, it becomes earthbound and sodden, and 
the music becomes elusive. 
Finally,
 I want to mention the extraordinary chapter entitled “Chacona, Lamento,
 Walking Blues.” There is no room to reiterate the entire chapter, and 
Ross does it better anyway. Suffice it to say that I would buy this book
 for the one chapter alone. Ross has generously posted a youtube video 
that introduces the concept.
This
 figure (essentially the notes A  G  F  E) is laced throughout classical
 and popular music, much like the Dies Irae, the doo-wop chord 
progression of G  Em  C  D, or G  D  Em  C (warning on a few lyrics not 
appropriate for small children.) The musical language transcends time 
and place, and can elevate even a mediocre song to a place of emotional 
resonance. 
While
 Ross (rightfully) cites and discusses Bach’s monumental Chaconne for 
solo violin, which thrills and torments violinists to this day, my 
favorite Chaconne is one that I loved when I first heard it as a 
beginning violinist, the Chaconne attributed to Vitali, but probably 
written, at least in part, by the violinist Ferdinand David. Regardless 
of who wrote it, it still gives me the shivers today. Enjoy. 
No comments:
Post a Comment