Source of book: Borrowed from the Library, but I would love to own it.
Alex Ross’ first book, The Rest is Noise,
is, hands down, the best book I have ever read on Twentieth Century
classical music. Even though I have played semi-professionally for
sixteen years, I never really grasped the connections in thought and
technique that united and divided the composers of the last century.
This book was revolutionary to my thought, and sparked an interest in
these “modern” works. Since I was not reviewing books at the time I read
it, this will have to suffice for a recommendation.
This
second book by Ross is not exactly a book about a topic, but a
collection of essays that occasionally intersect. With the exception of
the first chapter, all of the essays were originally published in The New Yorker,
although the author did revise several of them for the book. This is
not a bad thing, as Ross is interesting to read about anything music
related.
Ross
makes an interesting confession at the beginning of the book. He was
not exposed to popular music until age twenty. Up to that time, he had
been steeped in classical and nothing else. (I can identify to a degree:
I was a mostly
classical listener during my minority, and listened to nearly nothing
from my own generation.) Several of the essays give some of the author’s
story as he discovers the world of music he had not known. Thus, there
are interesting articles on Bjork, Radiohead, and a few others. No one
else could have made an entirely apt parallel between Kurt Cobain and
John Donne on the subject of suicide, but Ross makes the connection in a
startling yet fitting way.
Classical
music is still Ross’ first love (and mine too), and he distills the
paradox of the music into an insightful thought. “The music attracts the
reticent fraction of the population. It is an art of grand gestures and
vast dimensions that plays to mobs of the quiet and shy.” In so many
ways, music was an outlet for me as an introverted boy. I found my
emotional connection in my music: I could communicate with others in a
way that I never could through words.
The
chapter on recorded music was also thought provoking. John Philip Sousa
called them “infernal machines,” and they certainly did change the
nature of music listening and performance. While many lament that the
participation in the music making process is no longer an integral part
of our culture, Ross also notes that recorded music allowed African
American artists to break into the mainstream in a way that they never
could have done without recording devices.
I
would also note that the chapters on Verdi and Brahms were excellent
and enlightening in many ways, whether for the seasoned musician or for
the casual fan.
I
also enjoyed the chapter on the Los Angeles Philharmonic’s former music
director, Esa-Pekka Salonen. These days, Gustavo Dudamel is all the
rage. He is young, charismatic, and talented. Salonen never really
received the publicity. Ross is able to draw out his personality and
make him seem more human and revolutionary in his own way. As an
introvert myself, I loved the adage that Salonen, a Finn, was apt to
quote: “A Finnish introvert looks at his own shoes, while a Finnish
extrovert looks at other people’s shoes.”
Another
observation that struck me is found in the epic chapter on the Chacona
(which I will discuss further). The battle between the old and the new
in sacred music is timeless. Some would have you believe that all was
well until Rock and Roll burst onto the scene, and that prior to that
was an era of harmony and concord when all agreed on good taste and
“godly” music. Not so. From the dawn of recorded musical history, there
have always been two fights. On the one hand, each generation has
disdained the new forms and asserted that the old forms were best. On
the other, there has been a tension between a concept of “exalted” music
and “vulgar” music. Whether it was the question of Latin versus the
vernacular, or polyphony attainable only by professionals versus
popular, singable melodies; the issues have divided the church for
centuries. Nay, for millenia! Again, Ross captures the issue in a pithy
quote about the use of the Chaconne (a popular music form). “Dance fads
such as the chaconne indicated the growing vitality of the vernacular.
The Church, shaken by the challenge of the Reformation and its catchy
hymns of praise, saw the need to make its messages more transparent...”
As
a musician myself, I must also praise Ross for his chapter on the
Marlboro chamber music festival. I have played in string quartets for
more than half my life, and it is my dream (like most string players) to
spend a retirement making music with a few friends. The legendary
Emanuel Ax describes chamber music as a state where “no one leads and no
one follows.” This is completely true about an ensemble that has
attained that magical state where all hearts beat as one. Where the
music takes on a life of its own. When this occurs, joy, sorrow,
passion, and music become tangled up, and one emerges as from a trance,
certain that one will never be the same. I feel that this is also a good
representation of a truly successful marriage. No one leads, and no one
follows, because the music becomes all. As in a quartet, once the focus
becomes leading and following, it becomes earthbound and sodden, and
the music becomes elusive.
Finally,
I want to mention the extraordinary chapter entitled “Chacona, Lamento,
Walking Blues.” There is no room to reiterate the entire chapter, and
Ross does it better anyway. Suffice it to say that I would buy this book
for the one chapter alone. Ross has generously posted a youtube video
that introduces the concept.
This
figure (essentially the notes A G F E) is laced throughout classical
and popular music, much like the Dies Irae, the doo-wop chord
progression of G Em C D, or G D Em C (warning on a few lyrics not
appropriate for small children.) The musical language transcends time
and place, and can elevate even a mediocre song to a place of emotional
resonance.
While
Ross (rightfully) cites and discusses Bach’s monumental Chaconne for
solo violin, which thrills and torments violinists to this day, my
favorite Chaconne is one that I loved when I first heard it as a
beginning violinist, the Chaconne attributed to Vitali, but probably
written, at least in part, by the violinist Ferdinand David. Regardless
of who wrote it, it still gives me the shivers today. Enjoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment