Thursday, December 22, 2022

Christmas Poems 2022

This is my seventh (kind of) annual Christmas Poem post. I never got around to writing one in 2018. You can read the others here:

 

Christmas Poems 2015

Christmas Poems 2016

Christmas Poems 2017

Christmas Poems 2019

Christmas Poems 2020 

Christmas Poems 2021

 

And on a related note, my Christmas Carol post.

 

Other posts on Christmas:

 

The Christmas Wars, Or, How To Use Christmas As An Excuse To Be A Jerk

Night Shift At The Hospital on Christmas Eve

The Haunted Man by Charles Dickens

Reading A Christmas Carol With My Kids

Gloria

Magnificat

 

***

Taken near Reno, Nevada, last year.

 

I quote the following from last year’s post, as I do not think I can improve on it:

 

In part, this series has been my way of wrestling with the trauma of the past several years, which have brought the loss of our longtime church, loss of connection to my former faith tradition, estrangement from my parents (over religion and politics as well as the way those toxic ideologies have impacted my own family), and of course, the swerve of my country toward fascism and theofascism, driven by those of my former religious tradition. Christianity in the sense of following Christ has been replaced by Republicanity and, honestly, Ku Klux Klanity. 

 

Since Christmas has long been a favorite holiday for me, this has been rough. I miss the days when I could celebrate wholeheartedly, and feel a connection to others through that celebration. As a kid, family gatherings were something I looked forward to, so it was devastating that after I grew up, they became increasingly a battleground of family politics and the culture wars - and a chance for certain family members to bully my wife yet again - so we stopped going a number of years ago. I still enjoy what we have with the kids and with my brother and family, but there is always a certain bittersweet element to it, because of the losses that have come. 

 

Fortunately, I am not the only one with this experience, whether among my friends, or the poets of the past. There are a plethora of expressions that have spoken to me over the years, and they have tended to hold up pretty well. (See my carol post above, for what the prophets of the 19th Century had to say about slavery, for example.) So, as I have most years, I kept my eyes open for good Christmas season poems, and chose four to feature. (Don’t worry about the ones that didn’t make the cut - those are carefully noted for future years.) 

 

For this year, I would like to start with Phillip Larkin’s first published poem, written when he was all of 16 years old. I too wrote some poetry at that age, for school assignments. Mine was - to put it kindly - not as good as this one. 

 

Winter Nocturne by Philip Larkin

(first published poem, written at age 16)

 

Mantled in grey, the dusk steals slowly in,

Crossing the dead, dull fields with footsteps cold.

The rain drips drearily; night's fingers spin

A web of drifting mist o'er wood and wold,

As quiet as death. The sky is silent too,

Hard as granite and as fixed as fate.

The pale pond stands; ringed round with rushes few

And draped with leaning trees, it seems to wait

But for the coming of the winter night

Of deep December; blowing o'er the graves

Of faded summers, swift as the wind in flight

Ripples its silent face with lapping waves.

The rain falls still: bowing, the woods bemoan;

Dark night creeps in, and leaves the world alone.

 

Here where I live, we tend to get tule fog (aka convection fog) during the darkest part of winter, after a rain. It has become less common through a combination of climate change and the paving over of the farmland that used to be the bed of Tule Lake a couple hundred years ago. But for some reason, this year has had a run of some pretty solid fog. Most of the last two weeks at my house the fog hasn’t burned off. I am prone to seasonal affective disorder, so this bothers me a bit, while my wife loves this weather. To each their own.

 

In any case, Larkin captures the feeling of the fog, at dusk (or dawn), with the odd silence that the thick air brings. I love the line about “blowing o’er the graves of faded summers.” 

 

The poem is also in my favorite poetic form, the sonnet. In this case, an English (aka Shakespearean) Sonnet. The rhyme scheme is the usual ABAB CDCD EFEF GG. In breaking from the usual form, Larkin doesn’t put one single idea neatly into every quatrain. Instead, until the final couplet, the quatrains are enjambed, the sentences broken over the end and into the next. This and other stylistic flourishes already show the way to Larkin’s mature style. 

 

Next up is William Carlos Williams. 

 

Burning the Christmas Greens 

(by William Carlos Williams)

 

Their time past, pulled down

cracked and flung to the fire

—go up in a roar

 

All recognition lost, burnt clean

clean in the flame, the green

dispersed, a living red,

flame red, red as blood wakes

on the ash—

 

and ebbs to a steady burning

the rekindled bed become

a landscape of flame

 

At the winter’s midnight

we went to the trees, the coarse

holly, the balsam and

the hemlock for their green

 

At the thick of the dark

the moment of the cold’s

deepest plunge we brought branches

cut from the green trees

 

to fill our need, and over

doorways, about paper Christmas

bells covered with tinfoil

and fastened by red ribbons

 

we stuck the green prongs

in the windows hung

woven wreaths and above pictures

the living green. On the

 

mantle we built a green forest

and among those hemlock

sprays put a herd of small

white deer as if they

 

were walking there. All this!

and it seemed gentle and good

to us. Their time past,

relief! The room bare. We

 

stuffed the dead grate

with them upon the half burnt out

log’s smouldering eye, opening

red and closing under them

 

and we stood there looking down.

Green is a solace

a promise of peace, a fort

against the cold (though we

 

did not say so) a challenge

above the snow’s

hard shell. Green (we might

have said) that, where

 

small birds hide and dodge

and lift their plaintive

rallying cries, blocks for them

and knocks down

 

the unseeing bullets of

the storm. Green spruce boughs

pulled down by a weight of

snow—Transformed!

 

Violence leaped and appeared.

Recreant! roared to life

as the flame rose through and

our eyes recoiled from it.

 

In the jagged flames green

to red, instant and alive. Green!

those sure abutments . . . Gone!

lost to mind

 

and quick in the contracting

tunnel of the grate

appeared a world! Black

mountains, black and red—as

 

yet uncolored—and ash white,

an infant landscape of shimmering

ash and flame and we, in

that instant, lost,

 

breathless to be witnesses,

as if we stood

ourselves refreshed among

the shining fauna of that fire.

 

Williams is such a master with color. Green, red, black, white, and all the shades and nuances that go with them. When I read this one recently, I was astonished by its power. I don’t know that I need to say much of anything about it other than that. 

 

How about another sonnet? Why not? In this case, a rather unexpected author - mystery writer Agathe Christie. 

 

Gold, Frankincense and Myrrh

(Agatha Christie)

 

Gold, frankincense and myrrh … As Mary stands

Beside the Cross, those are the words that beat

Upon her brain, and make her clench her hands,

On Calvary, in noonday’s burning heat.

Gold, frankincense and myrrh. The Magi kneel

By simple shepherds all agog with joy,

And Angels praising God who doth reveal,

His love for men in Christ, the new born Boy.

 

Where now the incense? Where the kingly gold?

For Jesus only bitter myrrh and woe.

No kingly figure hangs here - just a son

In pain and dying … How shall Mary know

That with his sigh “ ‘Tis finished,” all is told;

Then - in that moment - Christ’s reign has begun? 

 

The sonnet form is a bit of a hybrid here. It is mostly formatted like an Italian (Petrarchan) Sonnet, with two quatrains and a sextet, and the sextet follows one of the usual forms. There is the turn at the ninth line. But the two quatrains use the rhyme scheme of an English sonnet, not the ABBAABBA of the traditional Italian form. 

 

I don’t tend to think of Christie as a poet, but my wife owns a Christmas book of hers that contains both prose and poetry. As with this one, the rest of the book is pretty standard religious Christmas stuff, written in an era when it didn’t carry as much baggage, perhaps. 

 

I was, however, struck by the simple truth here that gets so much lip service yet is so seldom understood as a fundamental truth to live by. These days, those who name the name of Christ here in my country are beating their plowshares into swords in the name of scorched earth culture war, seeking power and wealth and privilege at the expense of those different from them. 

 

But both the Nativity and the Cross carry a truly radical countercultural meaning. The Divine didn’t come to earth as a conquering warrior, slaying all who opposed him. He didn’t establish the usual kingdom that we humans so adore, with pomp and power and violence. Instead, the Divine reached to earth in the form of a helpless infant, the most human of humans, and, having preached a radical non-violent, anti-power, anti-wealth, and boundary smashing gospel - the “Good Spell,” was murdered for his trouble by the ever-brutalizing marriage of purity-based religion and law-and-order government. 

 

But, in the great twist that underlies everything Christ stood for, it was that moment when everything was darkest that everything changed. I haven’t believed in the relatively modern doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement for a long time, in part because it fails to have any connection to the radical teachings of Christ. It merely reinforces the same power based, violence based view of reality that was epitomized by the Roman Empire (and every evil authoritarian system before and since.) 

 

What Christie sets forth here is an older view - that the very act of murdering the man who stood for this revolutionary kingdom turned out to be the beginning of the revolution. To quote the Gospel of Luke:

 

Once, on being asked by the Pharisees when the kingdom of God would come, Jesus replied, “The coming of the kingdom of God is not something that can be observed, nor will people say, ‘Here it is,’ or ‘There it is,’ because the kingdom of God is in your midst.

 

You will not find the Kingdom in political power. You will not find the Kingdom among the rich and powerful. You will not find the Kingdom in a church building. (That’s the worst place to look, actually.) You will not find the Kingdom among those asserting their privilege. 

 

But the Kingdom is there. It is in our midst, if only we would put down our swords and look. 

 

And, on that note, let’s finish up with Countee Cullen, one of the Harlem Renaissance poets that opened my eyes to a new world when I discovered them in high school. 

 

Christus Natus Est 

(by Countee Cullen)

 

In Bethlehem

On Christmas morn,

The lowly gem

Of love was born.

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

Bright in her crown

Of fiery star,

Judea’s tow

Shone from afar:

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

While beasts in stall,

On bended knee,

Did carol all

Most joyously:

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

For bird and beast

He did not come

But for the least 

Of mortal scum,

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

Who lies in ditch?

Who begs his bread?

Wh has no stitch

For back or head?

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

Who wakes to weep,

Lies down to mourn?

Who in his sleep

Withdraws from scorn?

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

Ye outraged dust,

On field and plain,

To feed the lust

Of madmen slain:

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

The manger still 

Outshines the throne;

Christ must and will

Come to his own.

Hosannah! Christus Natus Est.

 

It starts off pretty conventional, right? Sounds like a carol of some sort. But then: “But for the least / Of mortal scum” - that took a turn. And from there, Cullen makes sure that his point is understood: the Nativity didn’t happen so that the comfortable would be made more comfortable. Rather, Christ came for the outcasts. The Kingdom is for you, he said. Blessed are the poor. 

 

This poem was written during World War One, a time of unprecedented and senseless slaughter. Cullen was looking for a way to express hope in a time of hopelessness - so many dying because madmen were seeking glory and power and the other things that lead men to slaughter each other. 

 

But in the end, and I believe this must be true or humankind will perish, the manger outshines the throne. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and pointed us toward the Upside Down Kingdom, where every hierarchy, every exercise of power, every act of violence will eventually be overcome. 

 

At this time of year, as the solstice flips the days from shrinking to growing, I think there is a sort of brilliance in the decision thousands of years ago to combine the celebration of the end of the solar year and the beginning of a new one with the celebration of another new beginning - and the hope of brighter days ahead. 

 

May the peace and hope of the season be with you. 



Wednesday, December 21, 2022

The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka

Source of book: I own this. 

 

Hey, another installment of “Books I should have read in High School.” For those who do not know my history, I was homeschooled when the only curriculum options readily available were A Beka (which I used) and even more racist and fundamentalist ones from Bob Jones University and ACE. Looking back, although the History and Science ones were horrible - not just biased but often misleading - the rest were at least academically rigorous. The main issue I have with the literature ones was that the 20th Century was largely ignored or given minimal attention. Kind of the “when we stopped being a Christian Nation™ our culture became worthless” sort of thing. Thus, most of the gaps in my literary education have been the classics of the 20th Century, something I have had to remedy with my reading. Fortunately, unlike too many people, I have kept reading after finishing school. 

 

Kafka is the rare author whose name has become a word in common usage. Just like “Shakespearean” conjures a specific image, “Kafkaesque” has a meaning beyond the man himself, applicable to any absurd and pointless situation. 


 

I own The Trial as well as a book containing his shorter fiction (including The Metamorphosis), but decided to start here because it is so well known. I mean, who doesn’t know at least the premise - a man wakes up one morning to find he has turned into a giant insect. And it also has one of the best opening lines in all of literature:

 

As Gregor Samsa awoke one morning from uneasy dreams he found himself transformed in his bed into a gigantic insect.

 

I read the book in one sitting - it is somewhere between a story and a novella at 56 pages in my edition - to experience it as a whole. 

 

Having read it, I found myself entirely uncertain as to what it means, if anything. It seemed at first to be a depiction of hopeless labor in service of a capitalist machine. But then it went in completely different directions. Gregor is the sole support of the family, but when he changes, the rest of the family seems to thrive - to get off their butts and go to work themselves. His sister starts off being the only one with compassion for him, but she eventually becomes the most eager to be rid of him. It seems a truly nihilistic work, where even the idea of meaning or purpose is rejected. 

 

I turned to the interwebs to see if I could find out if I was somehow missing the point. It turns out that there are many different interpretations. And when there are many answers, it usually means that none of them are particularly good. The one I thought was best was essentially “it’s a work of art that speaks for itself and thus needs no meaning.” In other words, like a symphony or a painting. I’ll go with that. 

 

Kafka seems to have been a bit of an odd duck. He was Jewish, his family was from Bohemia (now part of the Czech Republic), but spoke German and Yiddish primarily. He is believed to have had some form of Schizo-affective disorder, as well as anxiety. He died far too young of tuberculosis. 

 

He never found success from his writing during his lifetime, but gained in reputation after his death. An interesting thing about that is that he left his works to Max Brod, with the express instructions to destroy them. Which Brod didn’t do - he published everything, which eventually led to appreciation of Kafka’s works. Brod justified his defiance of the will by claiming that Kafka picked him because he knew Brod wouldn’t actually destroy anything. Which does sound like a possible premise for a Kafka story, if you think about it. 

 

I intend to read the rest of the stories and novellas in this particular book, and also The Trial at some point as I continue my exploration of the great works of the 20th Century. 

 

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

The Lion in Winter by James Goldman (BCT 2022)

Bakersfield Community Theater has been on a roll this year, with a number of great productions. I haven’t been able to see all of them, but found I had one day I wasn’t playing a gig to go see this one. 

 

Ah, the Henrys. Everyone knows Henry VIII, of course, and any Shakespeare fan likely has a fondness for Henry IV and Henry V. Henry VII is in Richard III, and Henry VI gets a whole three plays. 

 

But what about the other Henrys? Specifically, how about Henry II? Everyone knows two of his kids, of course, because of the Robin Hood stories. Good old King Richard the Lionheart, and weasly little brother Prince John and all that came with them. 

 

But who was Henry II? Well, some quick history here. The English monarchy kind of got going in the 9th Century, with Alfred the Great uniting much of what we now consider England (not including Scotland or Wales), but it didn’t really hold together until the 11th Century, and the Norman Conquest. 1066 and all that. William centralized power, and started the feudal system going in England, which really counts as the first true united England. William the Conqueror was succeeded by his two sons, first William II, then Henry I. Then came trouble. Henry I had only one child - a female, Matilda. He named her his heir, to great scandal, and much pearl clutching about women in power (and also the problem that she had married the future Holy Roman Emperor, so political complications.) A grandson of William the Conqueror asserted precedence, and this led to anarchy for a while, before he and Matilda compromised by putting her son, Henry II on the throne. 

 

Henry II was a forceful and ruthless ruler, bringing Wales into his sphere of influence, but eventually feuding with the Church (and getting Thomas a Becket murdered) and France - remember that the Normans still ruled parts of Frances as well. 

 

Oh, and Henry’s marriage to Eleanor of Aquitaine - at that time, queen of France - having stolen her from her husband, Henry VII of France….this is getting complex, isn’t it? In any case, he had a bunch of kids with Eleanor, including Henry (who died before his father), Richard, Geoffrey, and John. At various times, the sons were at war with their father, and Eleanor along with them. Ah, you think your family is dysfunctional?

 

Which is what this play is about. The entire drama takes place in Henry’s castle in Chinon, France, where the family has all gotten together - in part so that Henry can name his successor. 

 

This means that Eleanor is allowed to leave her imprisonment in London (can’t have wives trying to murder their husbands on the battlefield, can we?), the three surviving sons, and Alais, who is….um, this gets complicated too. 

 

So, after Eleanor left Henry VII of France, he married Constance, who died giving birth to Alais. So that makes Alais Eleanor’s stepdaughter. And also, Alais is betrothed to Richard, to help cement an important political alliance. This contract was entered when Alais was age 8, and she went to live with Henry and Eleanor pending her coming of age. While not definitively established, it was rumored that Alais was being bonked by Henry, and even had a child by him. For purposes of this play, it is assumed that she is Henry’s mistress, but that they do not have a child. 

 

There is also one more person present: Phillip II, king of France, who has come to insist that Henry fulfill the contract, and marry Alais to Richard. And Phillip is Alais’ half-brother, a younger sibling by Henry VII’s third wife. Got all that? And one more thing: there is some evidence suggesting that Richard was gay, although the speculation that he had an affair with Phillip is unlikely to be true. The play assumes it is, though. 

 

That’s one heck of an awkward Christmas. 

 

And that’s before you get to the core dispute in the play: Henry wants Richard to succeed him, while Eleanor wants John to be the next in line. And poor Geoffrey….nobody even mentions him. 

 

To unpack the plot from there would be impossible. There are two and a half hours of scheming by literally everyone involved, plots and counter plots and constantly shifting alliances. 

 

And the repartee - the wit is hilarious. Just a few lines:

 

John: "Poor John. Who says poor John? Don't everybody sob at once! My God, if I went up in flames there's not a living soul who'd pee on me to put the fire out!"

 

Richard: "Let's strike a flint and see.” 

 

And this one: 

 

“Of course he has a knife, he always has a knife, we all have knives! It's 1183 and we're barbarians!” 

 

And this one:

 

Henry: “I've plotted and schemed all my life. There is no other way to be a King, fifty and alive all at once.” 

 

And:

 

“I'm vilifying you, for God's sake — pay attention!”

 

Too much fun, for sure. 

 

This production was particularly fun because I know several of the people involved, and the rest are all veterans of the local stage - truly an all-star cast. 

 

Let’s start behind the scenes: Jan Hefner has been a friend for several years now, and she is always a pleasure to see on stage. This time, she was directing. The set was created by Ronnie Warren, another long-time actor, director, and designer. 

 

The royal couple was played by Xian (as Henry) and Julie Gaines (one of my favorite local actors in any role, this time as Eleanor.) The two of them had incredible chemistry, and so inhabited their roles as a couple in love and in hate with each other. 

 Eleanor of Aquitaine (Julie Gaines) and Henry II (Xian)

Josh Evans simmered his way through the role of Richard, the son who is so good at war and so frustrated with intrigue. He knows he is the best of the bunch, but only his mother can see it. Josh is a member of our book club, and I think I may have seen him in something else years ago, but this was my first time seeing him since our discussions of drama and literature particularly during Covid. 

 

Perrin Swanson, who acts everywhere around town, and does lights, sound, and design on everything he isn’t in, as far as I can tell, played the much ignored Geoffrey. He nailed the sense of frustration that nobody takes him seriously or thinks of him as having any value. He is invisible no matter what he does. 

 

Jordan Fulmer, after a recent run of playing good guys, returns to his typecasting (just kidding!) of playing the villain. Although everyone is a villain in this play, with the possible exception of Alais, who mostly wants to get to the end of the play alive and unmarried. (At least to Richard or John, both of whom she despises.) He simpers and whines his way through the role, complete with a very unfortunate bowl haircut and even less fortunate whimper. 

 Richard (Josh Evans), John (Jordan Fulmer), and Geoffrey (Perrin Swanson) with their mother (Julie Gaines)

 

Rounding out the cast are Brian Purcell as Phillip - he has grown into a wide variety of roles over the years we have watched him - and Maya Blackstone as Alais. 

Henry VII of France (Brian Purcell) and Alais (Maya Blackstone)

As I said, an all-star cast. Every role was excellent, and the ensemble chemistry notable. This last season at BCT has really been outstanding, from Blithe Spirit to The Importance of Being Earnest to 20th Century Blues. Bakersfield punches above its weight when it comes to the arts.